Many would argue that astrobiology research is interdisciplinary. Is it? And what does 'interdisciplinary' actually mean? What about the education side of it? Is interdisciplinary education a real thing or bogus? Let's challenge some of the things that we take for granted regarding interdisciplinarity. I am hoping to have a discussion on interdisciplinarity in astrobiology research and education using Rosenfield's taxonomy. I do not know the answers to the questions below but I am sure we will have a great time discussing them on S.A.G.A.N. Salon.

-Where does the current astrobiology research operate: multi-, inter-, or transdisciplinary?
-Where it should be?
-How can we train the next generation of researchers who want to conduct interdisciplinary research?
-Does interdisciplinary Ph.D. programs have a value?
-What are the barriers to and facilitators of interdisciplinary research?

Rosenfield's taxonomy (1992):
Unidisciplinarity: Researcher(s) are from a single discipline, may work together.
Multidisciplinarity: Researchers are from different disciplines and they work independently or sequentially. Each has own disciplinary perspective.
Interdisciplinarity: Researchers are from different disciplines and they work jointly. Each stays anchored in own field but results demonstrate some integration of diverse disciplines.
Transdisciplinarity: Researchers are from different disciplines and they work jointly to create a shared conceptual framework. This moves beyond discipline-specific theories, concepts, and approaches.

Views: 79

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It seems that Rosenfield's taxonomy is the ideal "roadmap" for astrobiology research. Transdisciplinarity should be the educational goal, but I don't think the community is there yet. Interdisciplinarity perhaps best characterizes the current state of astrobiology research. Not to be biased, but I think the UW model really pushes its students from multi- to trans-.

I'm looking forward to the discussion!

I do not think it will happen in our lifetime -transdisciplinarity as the educational goal. However, I hope that we can come up with a model that can broaden students' and researchers' intellectual peripheral vision -that is the understanding and knowledge of how other disciplines could be helpful to one's research (and vice versa). For instance, I paleobiologist told me, "if I don’t know anything about microbiology, then I'm not in a position to ask what a new phylogeny might do for my understanding of fossils." And I guess UW model does this.

Anyway, I am very excited about the discussion.



Ask your questions here!

Started by Gina Misra in SAGANet Discussions. Last reply by Peter Rasenberg Sep 1. 198 Replies

If you are trying to ask a question live during Ask an Astrobiologist, please do so in the main chatroom at the bottom of the screen! You can also ask on twitter @saganorg…Continue

© 2021   Blue Marble Space, a non-profit organization committed to science and science outreach.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service